Innovative system: status and new models
How to Cite
Skazochkin A.V. Innovative system: status and new models. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 94-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.1.5 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article attempts to adequately describe the reasons that negatively affect the development of the scientific and technological sphere in Russia and formulate a proposal forthe development of the innovative sphere in these Russian conditions. The systemic reasons are listed that, in the author’s opinion, affect the effectiveness of the existing innovation system:lack of counteraction to the elements of inhibition and degradation of the system; lack of constructive criticism of large-scale projects; a haphazard combination of successful practices implemented in other countries used in the construction of the Russian innovation system. Currently, in the Russian scientific and technological sphere, a non-competitive way of behavior of organizations is more profitable than a competitive one. Therefore, a stage is needed in the development of the domestic scientific and innovative system, when exclusively objective parameters of samples, objects, and goods should have priority in winning. A system of technological contests is proposed as the “assembly point” of the new innovativesystem. Their essence is to receive a financial prize and further development support not before creating a technical / technological solution, but after a real prototype of this solution was created, and after it showed the appropriate qualities and was demonstrated. The proposed management solution meets the basic principles of the traditional Russian management system: combining centralized management and wide autonomy of participants, stimulates “competition of administrators”, uses their best qualities for the development of scientific and innovative organizations. Particular attention is given to the personnel principles of managing organizations whose main specialization is the creation of the “new”. The characteristics of organizations are presented, the personnel of which differs in the degree of development of personal culture, which is the main factor in the development of any creative activity. It is proposed to carry out personnel decisions during the reform of such organizations with the help of a special personnel body from a group of scientists with professional and moral authority in the scientific community.
Keywords:
scientific and technological sphere, innovation system, Russian management system, technology contests, objective parameters, emergency mobilization mode, development program, foresight, administrator competition, modernization of the economy
References
Kuznetsova, E., Starostina, Yu. (2020). Schetnaya palata nazvala glavnye problemy rossiiskoi nauki [Audit Chamber named the main problems of Russian science]. [Electronic resource]. RBC. July 2. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/07/02/2020/5e3c1bf19a7947cce149aa99 (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2019). Osobennosti innovatsionnogo razvitiya na regional’nom urovne [Features of innovative development at the regional level]. In: Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i kachestvo regional’nogo razvitiya: opyt Kaluzhskoi oblasti [Public administration and the quality of regional development: the experience of the Kaluga region]. Coll. monograph. Ed. by S. E. Larina. CF RANEPA. Kaluga: AKF Politop. P. 85–117. (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2012). O formirovanii sistemy kommercheskogo ispol’zovaniya rezul’tatov nauchnykh issledovanii [On the formation of a system for the commercial use of research results]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 12. P. 129–158. (In Russ.).
Semenov, E. V. (2012). Rossiiskii nauchno-tekhnologicheskii kompleks v 2000–2010 gg. [Russian scientific and technological complex in 2000–2010]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 12. P. 7–19. (In Russ.).
Pivovarov, Yu. S., Fursov, A. I. (1998). Russkaya Sistema: genezis, struktura, funktsionirovanie (tezisy i rabochie gipotezy) [Russian System: Genesis, Structure, Functioning (theses and working hypotheses)]. Russian Historical Journal. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 13–95. (In Russ.).
Chistyakov, V. B. (2006). Vedushchie faktory natsional’noi istorii [Leading factors of national history]. Izvestia MGIU. No. 2 (3). P. 84–90. (In Russ.).
Glava RAN rasskazal Putinu ob otstavanii Rossii v nauchnoi sfere [The head of the Russian Academy of Sciences told Putin about Russia’s backlog in the scientific field]. (2016). [Electronic resource]. NEWSru.com. January 21. URL: https://www.newsru. com/russia/21jan2016/russcience.html (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Mirkin, Y. (2016). Istoriya ehkonomicheskoi politiki poslednei chetverti veka – ehto istoriya zaimstvovanii sebe vo vred [The history of economic policy of the last quarter of a century is the history of borrowing to one’s own harm]. [Electronic resource]. NEWSru.com. October 14. URL: https://blog.newsru.com/article/14oct2016/kopii (accessed 02.11.2019). (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2013). Birzha intellektual’nykh produktov kak tsentr sistemy kommertsializatsii rezul’tatov nauchnykh issledovanii [Exchange of intellectual products as the center of the system commercialization of research results]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 13. P. 205–216. (In Russ.).
Gusev, A. B. (2014). Pokoleniya federal’nykh tselevykh programm v sfere nauki: problemy sistemnosti i perspektivy programmno-tselevogo metoda [Generations of federal target programs in the field of science: systemic problems and prospects of the program-target method]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 16. P. 90–118. (In Russ.).
Gusev, A. B. (2016). Mobilizatsiya rossiiskoi nauki: myagkii ili zhestkii stsenarii? [Mobilization of Russian science: soft or hard scenario?]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 3. P. 7–26. (In Russ.).
Doklad RAN «O realizatsii gosudarstvennoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i vazhneishikh nauchnykh dostizheniyakh uchenykh v 2018 godu». [Report on the implementation of the state scientific and technical policy in the Russian Federation and the most important scientific achievements of scientists in 2018]. (2019). Moscow: RAS. 622 p. (In Russ.).
Strategicheskoe razvitie malogo biznesa i formy podderzhki individual’nogo predprinimatel’stva
[Strategic development of small business and forms of supporting individual entrepreneurship]. (2018). [Electronic resource]. Monograph. Elect. ed. Nizhny Novgorod: NGO Professional Science. 302 p. URL: http://scipro.ru/conf/monographbusiness.pdf. (accessed 02.11.2020). (In Russ.).
The Federal Law “On the Skolkovo Innovation Center” dated September 28. 09.
No. 244-FL. (In Russ.).
Medvedev, Ju. (2017). Na post prezidenta RAN pretenduyut tri kandidata [Three candidates apply for the post of president of the RAS]. Russian newspaper. No. 57 (7223). March 19. (In Russ.).
Sitnikov, A. (2017). Medvedev ukazal put’ v «svetloe budushchee» Rossii [Medvedev showed the way to the “bright future” of Russia]. [Electronic resource]. Svobodnaya pressa. July 9. URL: https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/176434/ (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2019). «Atomnyi proekt» SSSR: nekotorye upravlencheskie aspekty [“Atomic project” of the USSR: some managerial aspects]. Science management:theory and practice. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 149–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/ smtp.2019.1.1.6 (In Russ.).
Mungalov, D. (2017). Interv’yu s Al’bertom Efimovym “Tekhnologicheskie konkursy adresovany ne startapam, a konsortsiumam” [Interview with Albert Efimov “Technology competitions are not addressed to startups, but to consortia”. [Electronic resource]. Skolkovo: [web-site]. August 3. URL: http://sk.ru/news/b/articles/archive/2017/08/03/albert-efimov-tehnologicheskie-konkursy-adresovany-ne-startapam-a-konsorciumam.aspx (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Prokhorov, A. P. (2007). Russkaya model’ upravleniya [Russian management model]. Moscow: Eksmo. 384 p. (In Russ.).
Derlugyan, G. (2000). Gosudarstvo i globalizatsiya [State and globalization]. Expert. No. 48. P. 48–56. (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V., Ignatov, I. I. (2015). Organizatsionnye formy zarubezhnogo innovatsionnogo obrazovaniya: tendentsii, metody, praktika [Organizational forms of foreign innovative education: trends, methods, practice]. Kaluga: Eidos. 180 p. (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2019). Osobennosti innovatsionnogo razvitiya na regional’nom urovne [Features of innovative development at the regional level]. In: Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i kachestvo regional’nogo razvitiya: opyt Kaluzhskoi oblasti [Public administration and the quality of regional development: the experience of the Kaluga region]. Coll. monograph. Ed. by S. E. Larina. CF RANEPA. Kaluga: AKF Politop. P. 85–117. (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2012). O formirovanii sistemy kommercheskogo ispol’zovaniya rezul’tatov nauchnykh issledovanii [On the formation of a system for the commercial use of research results]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 12. P. 129–158. (In Russ.).
Semenov, E. V. (2012). Rossiiskii nauchno-tekhnologicheskii kompleks v 2000–2010 gg. [Russian scientific and technological complex in 2000–2010]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 12. P. 7–19. (In Russ.).
Pivovarov, Yu. S., Fursov, A. I. (1998). Russkaya Sistema: genezis, struktura, funktsionirovanie (tezisy i rabochie gipotezy) [Russian System: Genesis, Structure, Functioning (theses and working hypotheses)]. Russian Historical Journal. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 13–95. (In Russ.).
Chistyakov, V. B. (2006). Vedushchie faktory natsional’noi istorii [Leading factors of national history]. Izvestia MGIU. No. 2 (3). P. 84–90. (In Russ.).
Glava RAN rasskazal Putinu ob otstavanii Rossii v nauchnoi sfere [The head of the Russian Academy of Sciences told Putin about Russia’s backlog in the scientific field]. (2016). [Electronic resource]. NEWSru.com. January 21. URL: https://www.newsru. com/russia/21jan2016/russcience.html (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Mirkin, Y. (2016). Istoriya ehkonomicheskoi politiki poslednei chetverti veka – ehto istoriya zaimstvovanii sebe vo vred [The history of economic policy of the last quarter of a century is the history of borrowing to one’s own harm]. [Electronic resource]. NEWSru.com. October 14. URL: https://blog.newsru.com/article/14oct2016/kopii (accessed 02.11.2019). (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2013). Birzha intellektual’nykh produktov kak tsentr sistemy kommertsializatsii rezul’tatov nauchnykh issledovanii [Exchange of intellectual products as the center of the system commercialization of research results]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 13. P. 205–216. (In Russ.).
Gusev, A. B. (2014). Pokoleniya federal’nykh tselevykh programm v sfere nauki: problemy sistemnosti i perspektivy programmno-tselevogo metoda [Generations of federal target programs in the field of science: systemic problems and prospects of the program-target method]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 16. P. 90–118. (In Russ.).
Gusev, A. B. (2016). Mobilizatsiya rossiiskoi nauki: myagkii ili zhestkii stsenarii? [Mobilization of Russian science: soft or hard scenario?]. Science. Innovation. Education. No. 3. P. 7–26. (In Russ.).
Doklad RAN «O realizatsii gosudarstvennoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i vazhneishikh nauchnykh dostizheniyakh uchenykh v 2018 godu». [Report on the implementation of the state scientific and technical policy in the Russian Federation and the most important scientific achievements of scientists in 2018]. (2019). Moscow: RAS. 622 p. (In Russ.).
Strategicheskoe razvitie malogo biznesa i formy podderzhki individual’nogo predprinimatel’stva
[Strategic development of small business and forms of supporting individual entrepreneurship]. (2018). [Electronic resource]. Monograph. Elect. ed. Nizhny Novgorod: NGO Professional Science. 302 p. URL: http://scipro.ru/conf/monographbusiness.pdf. (accessed 02.11.2020). (In Russ.).
The Federal Law “On the Skolkovo Innovation Center” dated September 28. 09.
No. 244-FL. (In Russ.).
Medvedev, Ju. (2017). Na post prezidenta RAN pretenduyut tri kandidata [Three candidates apply for the post of president of the RAS]. Russian newspaper. No. 57 (7223). March 19. (In Russ.).
Sitnikov, A. (2017). Medvedev ukazal put’ v «svetloe budushchee» Rossii [Medvedev showed the way to the “bright future” of Russia]. [Electronic resource]. Svobodnaya pressa. July 9. URL: https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/176434/ (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V. (2019). «Atomnyi proekt» SSSR: nekotorye upravlencheskie aspekty [“Atomic project” of the USSR: some managerial aspects]. Science management:theory and practice. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 149–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/ smtp.2019.1.1.6 (In Russ.).
Mungalov, D. (2017). Interv’yu s Al’bertom Efimovym “Tekhnologicheskie konkursy adresovany ne startapam, a konsortsiumam” [Interview with Albert Efimov “Technology competitions are not addressed to startups, but to consortia”. [Electronic resource]. Skolkovo: [web-site]. August 3. URL: http://sk.ru/news/b/articles/archive/2017/08/03/albert-efimov-tehnologicheskie-konkursy-adresovany-ne-startapam-a-konsorciumam.aspx (accessed 11.02.2020). (In Russ.).
Prokhorov, A. P. (2007). Russkaya model’ upravleniya [Russian management model]. Moscow: Eksmo. 384 p. (In Russ.).
Derlugyan, G. (2000). Gosudarstvo i globalizatsiya [State and globalization]. Expert. No. 48. P. 48–56. (In Russ.).
Skazochkin, A. V., Ignatov, I. I. (2015). Organizatsionnye formy zarubezhnogo innovatsionnogo obrazovaniya: tendentsii, metody, praktika [Organizational forms of foreign innovative education: trends, methods, practice]. Kaluga: Eidos. 180 p. (In Russ.).
Article
Received: 14.02.2020
Accepted: 25.03.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Skazochkin, A. V. (2020). Innovative system: status and new models. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 94-116. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.1.5
Section
Problems of Innovation Development
