National Innovation System: Construction in Progress
Research Article
How to Cite
Kravchenko N.A. National Innovation System: Construction in Progress. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2021. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 44-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.5 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of the innovation system in Russia over the past years, based on international data. A comparative analysis of the strengths is carried out and development problems are shown, among which the main attention is paid to the low degree of connectedness of the main actors: science, education, the business sector and the state. In recent years, numerous state initiatives have been undertaken with the purpose to place Russia among the countries - world leaders in the field of science, technology and innovation. The strengths of Russia have been and remain the quality of human capital (secondary and tertiary education) and the knowledge creation (number of researchers, number of patents).Opportunities for transforming generated knowledge into innovative goods and services are limited by the low quality of regulatory and political institutions and weak interaction of individual elements of the innovation system
Keywords:
innovation system, strategy, global innovation index, interactions
References
1. Kravchenko, N. A., Yusupova, A. T. and Kuznetsova, S. A. (2019). Research and Business Cooperation: International Practice and Siberian Experience. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. Vol. 12, no. 4. P. 643–659.
2. Gupta N., Shipp S., Nash S. [et al.] (2013). Innovation Policies of Russia. Virginia: Institute for Defense Analyses.
3. Kupershtokh, N. A. (2020). The reform of the RAS 2013 and its consequences for regional scientific centers (on the example of the Siberian Branch of the RAS). Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 2, no. 1. P. 54–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.1.3.
4. Doklad «O realizatsii gosudarstvennoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i vazhneishikh nauchnykh dostizheniyakh, poluchennykh rossiiskimi uchenymi v 2020 godu» (utverzhden resheniem obshchego sobraniya RAN 20–21 aprelya 2021 g.) [Report “On the implementation of the State Scientific and Technical Policy in the Russian Federation and the most important scientific achievements received by Russian scientists in 2020” (approved by the decision of the General Meeting of the Russian Academy of Sciences on April 20-21, 2021)] (2021). Moscow: RAS publ. 190 p.
5. The Global Competitiveness Report Special Edition 2020: How Countries are Performing on the Road to Recovery (2020). Ed. by K. Schwab, S. Zahidi. Cologny, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
2. Gupta N., Shipp S., Nash S. [et al.] (2013). Innovation Policies of Russia. Virginia: Institute for Defense Analyses.
3. Kupershtokh, N. A. (2020). The reform of the RAS 2013 and its consequences for regional scientific centers (on the example of the Siberian Branch of the RAS). Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 2, no. 1. P. 54–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.1.3.
4. Doklad «O realizatsii gosudarstvennoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi politiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i vazhneishikh nauchnykh dostizheniyakh, poluchennykh rossiiskimi uchenymi v 2020 godu» (utverzhden resheniem obshchego sobraniya RAN 20–21 aprelya 2021 g.) [Report “On the implementation of the State Scientific and Technical Policy in the Russian Federation and the most important scientific achievements received by Russian scientists in 2020” (approved by the decision of the General Meeting of the Russian Academy of Sciences on April 20-21, 2021)] (2021). Moscow: RAS publ. 190 p.
5. The Global Competitiveness Report Special Edition 2020: How Countries are Performing on the Road to Recovery (2020). Ed. by K. Schwab, S. Zahidi. Cologny, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Article
Received: 06.11.2021
Accepted: 29.12.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Kravchenko, N. A. (2021). National Innovation System: Construction in Progress. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 3(4), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.5
Section
Discussion
