Наука и инновации: разнообразие связей

  • Виталий Леонидович Тамбовцев МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия vitalytambovtsev@gmail.com ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0667-3391
Для цитирования
Тамбовцев В. Л. Наука и инновации: разнообразие связей // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2021. Том 3. № 4. С. 17-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.2


Цель статьи – проанализировать связь научных исследований с разными типами инноваций. Для этого показывается, что инновационный процесс имеет системный характер, и наука присутствует как неотъемлемый элемент в осуществлении каждого из рассмотренных типов инноваций – производственных, организационных и социальных. Даётся краткая характеристика этих типов и показано, что вклад науки осуществляется на разных этапах инновационного процесса, рассматриваемого как процесс решения той или иной проблемы. Наиболее значим вклад наук (особенно естественных) в производственные инновации; общественные науки способны внести некоторый вклад в организационные инновации; проблемы, которым посвящены социальные инновации, не имеют научного решения, в силу чего общественные науки могут обеспечить лишь разработку вариантов инноваций, но не выбор между ними.
Ключевые слова:
наука, производственные инновации, организационные инновации, социальные инновации

Биография автора

Виталий Леонидович Тамбовцев, МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия
Доктор экономических наук, профессор


1. Bush, V. (1945). Science, the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

2. Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S. and Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. Vol. 104, is. 12. P. 510–520.

3. Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy. Vol. 20, is. 1. P. 1–12.

4. Hameri, A. P. (1996). Technology transfer between basic research and industry. Technovation. Vol. 16, is. 2. P. 51–57, 91–92.

5. Tussen, R., Buter, R. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics. Vol. 47, is. 2. P. 389–412.

6. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science. Vol. 48, is. 1. P. 1–23.

7. Balconi, M., Brusoni, S. and Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy. Vol. 39, is. 1, P. 1–13.

8. Bellucci, A. and Pennacchio, L. (2016). University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 41, is. 4. P. 730–752.

9. Ahmadpoor, M. and Jones, B. F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science. Vol. 357, is. 6351. P. 583–587.

10. Duderstadt, J. J. (1999). New roles for the 21st-century university. Issues in Science and Technology. Vol. 16, is. 2. P. 37–44.

11. Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, Vol. 20, pp. 441–456

12. Compagnucci L., Spigarelli F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 161, article 120284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

13. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics on innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. Vol. 29, no. 2. P. 109–123.

14. O´Shea, R. P., Chugh, H. and Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and Consequences of University Spinoff Activity: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 33, is. 6. P. 653–666.

15. Hand, E., Mole, B., Morello, L. [et al.] (2013). A back seat for basic science. Nature. Vol. 496. P. 277–279.

16. Caulfield, T. and Ogbogu, U. (2015). The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits. BMC Medical Ethics. Vol. 16, article 70. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0064-2.

17. Larsen, M. T. (2011). The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence. Research Policy. Vol. 40, is. 1. P. 6–19.

18. Schraagen, J. M. (2013). To publish or not to publish: a systems analysis of longitudinal trends in publishing strategies of a human factors research organization. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. Vol. 14, is. 5. P. 499–530.

19. Quaglione, D., Muscio, A. and Vallanti, G. (2015). The two sides of academic research: do basic and applied activities complement each other? Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Vol. 24, is. 7. P. 660–681.

20. Siota, J. (2018). The Dilemma: Academic Quality or Economic Sustainability. In: Siota J. Linked Innovation: Commercializing Discoveries at Research Centers. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 1–12.

21. UK Government White Paper (1993). Realising our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology (Cn 2250). London: HMSO.

22. Stein, J. C. (1989). Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 104, is. 4. P. 655–669.

23. Gabaix, X. and Laibson, D. (2006). Shrouded Attributes, Consumer Myopia, and Information Suppression in Competitive Markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 121, is. 2. P. 505–540.

24. Docherty, P. and HurstInvestor, G. (2018). Myopia and the Momentum Premium across International Equity Markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 53, is. 6. P. 2465–2490.

25. Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative Efficiency vs. “X-Efficiency”. American Economic Review. Vol. 56, no. 3. P. 392–415.

26. Dougherty, D. and Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained production innovation in large, mature organisations: Overcoming innovation-to-organisation problems. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 39, is. 5. P. 1120–1153.

27. Lam, A. (2005). Organizational innovation. In: Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 115–147.

28. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 34, no. 3. P. 555–590.

29. Kenney, M. and Florida, R. (1988). Beyond Mass Production: Production and the Labour Process in Japan. Politics and Society. Vol. 16, is. 1. P. 121–158.

30. Womack, J. P. and Jones, D. T. (1994). From lean production to the lean enterprise. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 72, no. 2. P. 93–103.

31. Williams, K., Haslam, C., Williams, J. [et al.] (1992). Against lean production. Economy and Society. Vol. 21, no. 3. P. 321–354.

32. Papahristodoulou, C. (1994). Is Lean Production the Solution? Economic and Industrial Democracy. Vol. 15, is. 3. P. 457–476.

33. Pettersen, J. (2009). Defining lean production: Some conceptual and practical issues. TQM Journal. Vol. 21. no. 2. P. 127–142.

34. Nithia, K. K, Yusof, N. M. and Saman, M. Z. M. (2015). Lean Production Weaknesses in Manufacturing Industry: A Review. Applied Mechanics and Materials. Vol. 735. P. 344–348.

35. Ishikawa, K. (1985). What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

36. Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Business.

37. Goldman, S., Nagel, R. and Preiss, K. (1995). Agile Competitors and Virtual Organisations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold

38. Miles, R. and Snow, C. (1997). Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form. Academy of Management Executive. Vol. 11, no. 4. P. 7–24.

39. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 16, no. 3. P. 586–612.

40. Newell, S., Robertson, M. and Swan, J. (2001). Management Fads and Fashions. Organization. Vol. 8, no. 1. P. 5–15.

41. Huczynski, A. A. (1992). Management Guru Ideas and the 12 Secrets of their Success. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Vol. 13, no. 5. P. 15–20.

42. Drucker, P. F. (1957). Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New Post-Modern World. New York: Harper & Row Publisher.

43. Drucker, P. F. (1987). Social innovation, management, new dimension. Long Range Planning. Vol. 20, is. 6. P. 29–34.

44. Edwards-Schachter, M. and Wallace, M. L. (2017). “Shaken, but not stirred”: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 119. P. 64–79.

45. Solis-Navarrete, J. A., Bucio-Mendoza, S. and Paneque-Gálvez, J. (2021). What is not social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 173, article 121190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121190

46. Moulaert F., Martinelli F., Swyngedouw E. and Gonzales S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies. Vol. 42, is. 11. P. 1969–1990. 47. Rittel H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences. Vol. 4, no. 2. P. 155–169.

Поступила: 27.10.2021

Опубликована: 29.12.2021

Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:

Тамбовцев, В. Л. (2021). Наука и инновации: разнообразие связей. Управление наукой: теория и практика, 3(4), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.2