Public science and technology policy in modern Russia: idea and implementation
How to Cite
Semenov E.V. Public science and technology policy in modern Russia: idea and implementation. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 51-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.1 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The paper substantiates the understanding of public science and technology policy as an impact of public administration on the sphere of science and technology in order to implement national and state interests and values. The paper shows the correlation of the concepts of public science and technology policy and public administration in science and technology. Five methods of public science and technology policy analysis are proposed. A significant distortion of the goals and objectives of public science and technology policy in modern Russia in the process of their implementation is shown. Revealed are the negative consequences of using performance indicators in public administration in science and technology as production of performance indicators suppresses production of knowledge, technology development and personnel development. The paper shows the replacement of real activity aimed at solving the problem of overcoming the technological gap in Russia by increasing the document flow due to the growth of instructions and reporting on the production of performance indicators. It is proposed to return qualified personnel to the system of public administration in science and technology, as well as to return to science and technology governance by setting meaningful tasks instead of meaningless indicators
References
Tambovtsev, V. (2018). On the scientific validity of scientific policy in the Russian Federation // Voprosy ehkonomiki. No 2. P. 5–32. (In Russ).
Semenov, E. (2013). Scientific and technological sphere (R&D sphere): ways of representing an object // Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. Vol. 14. P. 82–98. (In Russ).
Semenov, E. (2009). Rossiya s naukoi i bez nauki [Russia with and without science]. Мoscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. 168 p. (In Russ).
Tambovtsev, V. (1990). Formal’noe i neformal’noe v upravlenii ehkonomikoi [Formal and informal in economic management]. М. Nauka. 95 с. (In Russ).
Tambovtsev, V. (1993). Pyatyi rynok: ehkonomicheskie problemy proizvodstva informatsii [Fifth market: economic problems of information production]. М.: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 128.p. (In Russ).
Semenov, E. (1990). Ogon’i pepel nauki [Fire and ashes of science]. Novosibirsk. 188p. (In Russ).
Chemodanov, M. (1982). Kontseptsii rosta nauki i faktor intensifikatsii [Concepts of the growth of science and the factor of intensification]. Novosibirsk. 199 p. (In Russ).
Uchenye zapiski FNISTs RAN (2019). On the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of scientists in the field of social sciences. Vyp. 4. Moscow, FNISTs RAS. 60 p. (In Russ).
Uchenye zapiski FNISTs RAN: materialy zasedaniya Uchenogo soveta (2019). Moskva, 19.12. Vyp. 1. Moscow, FNISTs RAS. 64 p. (In Russ).
Vedeneeva, N (2019). Akademik ob urovne nauki: nizkaya zarplata, iznoshennaya material’naya baza [Academician on the level of science: low salary, worn out material base] / URL: https://www.mk.ru/science/2019/03/06/akademik-ob-urovne-nauki-nizkaya-zarplata-iznoshennaya-materialnaya-baza.html Accessed — 13.08.2019 (In Russ).
Semenov, E. (2013). Scientific and technological sphere (R&D sphere): ways of representing an object // Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie. Vol. 14. P. 82–98. (In Russ).
Semenov, E. (2009). Rossiya s naukoi i bez nauki [Russia with and without science]. Мoscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury. 168 p. (In Russ).
Tambovtsev, V. (1990). Formal’noe i neformal’noe v upravlenii ehkonomikoi [Formal and informal in economic management]. М. Nauka. 95 с. (In Russ).
Tambovtsev, V. (1993). Pyatyi rynok: ehkonomicheskie problemy proizvodstva informatsii [Fifth market: economic problems of information production]. М.: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. 128.p. (In Russ).
Semenov, E. (1990). Ogon’i pepel nauki [Fire and ashes of science]. Novosibirsk. 188p. (In Russ).
Chemodanov, M. (1982). Kontseptsii rosta nauki i faktor intensifikatsii [Concepts of the growth of science and the factor of intensification]. Novosibirsk. 199 p. (In Russ).
Uchenye zapiski FNISTs RAN (2019). On the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of scientists in the field of social sciences. Vyp. 4. Moscow, FNISTs RAS. 60 p. (In Russ).
Uchenye zapiski FNISTs RAN: materialy zasedaniya Uchenogo soveta (2019). Moskva, 19.12. Vyp. 1. Moscow, FNISTs RAS. 64 p. (In Russ).
Vedeneeva, N (2019). Akademik ob urovne nauki: nizkaya zarplata, iznoshennaya material’naya baza [Academician on the level of science: low salary, worn out material base] / URL: https://www.mk.ru/science/2019/03/06/akademik-ob-urovne-nauki-nizkaya-zarplata-iznoshennaya-materialnaya-baza.html Accessed — 13.08.2019 (In Russ).
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Semenov, E. V. (2019). Public science and technology policy in modern Russia: idea and implementation. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.1
Section
Science and Technology Policy
