Scientomentrics: a little bit of history and modern Russian realities
How to Cite
Moskaleva O.V., Akoev M.A. Scientomentrics: a little bit of history and modern Russian realities. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 135-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.5 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article describes briefly the history od scientometrics and practical issues of research evaluation by bibliometric indicators in Russian Federation. The special attention is paid for main problems of of using specific bibliometric indicators and errors in their use. Possible options for the use of bibliometric indicators, taking into account international experience, are proposed
Keywords:
scientometrics, bibliometrics, research evaluation, international experience
References
Nalimov, V., Mulchenko Z. (1969). Naukometriya [Scientometrics]. Moscow, Nauka. 192 р. (In Russ).
Csiszar, A. (2017). The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science. Nature. Vol. 551. No 7679. P. 163–165. doi: 10.1038/551163a.
Gross, P., Gross, E. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science (New York, N.Y.). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 66. No. 1713. P. 385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385.
Garfield, E. (1961). Science Citation Index. Science Citation Index. Vol. 1. P. 5–16.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 122. No. 3159. P. 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108.
Akoev, M. et al. (2014). Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatori razvitiia naukii tehnologii [Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of the Development of Science and Technology]. Edited by М. А. Акоев. UrFU. doi: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0000. 250 p. (In Russ).
Moskaleva, O. et al. (2018). Russian index of Science citation: Overview and review. Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s11192- 018-2758-y.
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. P. 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.
Moed, H. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Guerrero-Bote, V. P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001.
Addition to the family. There are more and more scientific indicators. POISK — science and technology news. No. 9–10. 2017. URL: https://www.poisknews.ru/magazine/22830/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics. Vol. 85. No. 3. P. 741–754. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9.
Alonso, S. et al. (2009). H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 273–289. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 102. No. 46. P. 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0507655102.
Moed, H. (2010). CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 436–438. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.009.
QS World University Rankings — Methodology. Top Universities (19.06.2019). URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
World University Rankings 2019: methodology. Times Higher Education (THE) (no date). URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/ methodology-world-university-rankings-2019 / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 01.12.2016 г. № 642 (no date). URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449 /Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Frascati Manual 2015 (2015). OECD (The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities). URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/ frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012-en.htm // Accessed — 9 July 2019. doi: 10.1787/9789264239012-en.
Collins R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press. 1120 p.
Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication.| Helsinki-initiative.org (no date). URL: https://www.helsinki-initiative.org/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Moed, H. F., Markusova, V. and Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics. Vol. 116. No. 2. P. 1153–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8.
Sterligov, I. (2017). Five Years of Unprecedented Growth: Bibliometric Macro Indicators 2012–2016. Troitsky Variant — Nauka. No. 227. P. 4. URL: http://trv-science. ru/2017/04/25/pyatiletka-nevidannogo-rosta/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2012). URLt: https://sfdora. org/read/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. 25. Hicks, D. et al. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. Vol. 520. P. 429–431.
Bibliometrics for the benefit of Russian science (no date). URL: https://rasep.ru/ sovet-po-etike/bibliometriya-vo-blago-rossijskoj-nauki /Accessed — 15 July 2019. (In Russ)
Snowball Metrics — standardized research metrics — by the sector for the sector Snowball Metrics (no date). URL: https://www.snowballmetrics.com/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Goodhart, C. (1984). Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience. Monetary Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan Education UK, P. 91–121. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.
Csiszar, A. (2017). The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science. Nature. Vol. 551. No 7679. P. 163–165. doi: 10.1038/551163a.
Gross, P., Gross, E. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science (New York, N.Y.). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 66. No. 1713. P. 385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385.
Garfield, E. (1961). Science Citation Index. Science Citation Index. Vol. 1. P. 5–16.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Vol. 122. No. 3159. P. 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108.
Akoev, M. et al. (2014). Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatori razvitiia naukii tehnologii [Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of the Development of Science and Technology]. Edited by М. А. Акоев. UrFU. doi: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0000. 250 p. (In Russ).
Moskaleva, O. et al. (2018). Russian index of Science citation: Overview and review. Scientometrics. Springer Netherlands. Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s11192- 018-2758-y.
González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. P. 379–391. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002.
Moed, H. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002.
Guerrero-Bote, V. P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001.
Addition to the family. There are more and more scientific indicators. POISK — science and technology news. No. 9–10. 2017. URL: https://www.poisknews.ru/magazine/22830/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics. Vol. 85. No. 3. P. 741–754. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9.
Alonso, S. et al. (2009). H-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 273–289. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 102. No. 46. P. 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0507655102.
Moed, H. (2010). CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvre. Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 436–438. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.009.
QS World University Rankings — Methodology. Top Universities (19.06.2019). URL: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
World University Rankings 2019: methodology. Times Higher Education (THE) (no date). URL: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/ methodology-world-university-rankings-2019 / Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 01.12.2016 г. № 642 (no date). URL: http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449 /Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
Frascati Manual 2015 (2015). OECD (The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities). URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/ frascati-manual-2015-9789264239012-en.htm // Accessed — 9 July 2019. doi: 10.1787/9789264239012-en.
Collins R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Harvard University Press. 1120 p.
Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication.| Helsinki-initiative.org (no date). URL: https://www.helsinki-initiative.org/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Moed, H. F., Markusova, V. and Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics. Vol. 116. No. 2. P. 1153–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8.
Sterligov, I. (2017). Five Years of Unprecedented Growth: Bibliometric Macro Indicators 2012–2016. Troitsky Variant — Nauka. No. 227. P. 4. URL: http://trv-science. ru/2017/04/25/pyatiletka-nevidannogo-rosta/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. (In Russ)
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2012). URLt: https://sfdora. org/read/ Accessed — 9 July 2019. 25. Hicks, D. et al. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. Vol. 520. P. 429–431.
Bibliometrics for the benefit of Russian science (no date). URL: https://rasep.ru/ sovet-po-etike/bibliometriya-vo-blago-rossijskoj-nauki /Accessed — 15 July 2019. (In Russ)
Snowball Metrics — standardized research metrics — by the sector for the sector Snowball Metrics (no date). URL: https://www.snowballmetrics.com/ Accessed — 9 July 2019.
Goodhart, C. (1984). Problems of Monetary Management: The UK Experience. Monetary Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan Education UK, P. 91–121. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Moskaleva, O. V., & Akoev, M. A. (2019). Scientomentrics: a little bit of history and modern Russian realities. Science Management: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2019.1.1.5
Section
Science in the Mirror of Scientometrics
